dagey.net

The seven year itch comes from fooling around during the fourth, fifth, and sixth years.

Blog
:: portal :: :: pics :: :: blog :: :: articles :: :: contact ::

a113n’s daily dose


23.Apr.2009

Cheap communications for all

Filed under: Government, Local, Personal, Politics, State — a113n @ 17:21  (Current Mood: Hopeful hopeful)

Salem, NC just got a bit more enticing from my point-of-view. The citizens of this small town, supported by their local government, have taken on Time Warner Cable by establishing a civil-run ISP, providing 10 Mbps both up and down at each house, cable television, and internet phone, all for $99/month. The system, named Greenlight, came into existence after the town petitioned Time Warner for better service in the area; Time Warner refused, and the citizens took it upon themselves.

Now Time Warner is pulling together it’s lobbying forces on a bill in the North Carolina legislature that will make it more difficult for other cities to follow suit. In the name of “anti-competition”, Time Warner is claiming that Greenlight unfairly leverages the power of the government to push Time Warner out of business in Salem and any other city that follows suit. Mama Bear would call shenanigans. I’m going to come out right, with no child-filtering, and say this is BULL SHIT. I am sick and tired of the large corporations pushing around their weight in order to maintain their bottom line while stomping in the American people. Tiered pricing. (Un)Net-Neutrality.

And, I’m very jealous that my small town of Unionville or even Bloomington does not do something similar. I may have a friend in the higher-up–should I contact her and ask for advice? This town would jump on this in a heartbeat. So long Comcast–Time Warner’s brother-in-arms.

      • Current Music: Apocalyptica - One
      • Current Location: Office

              21.Apr.2009

              Racial Hypocrisy or Conspiracy?

              Filed under: Freedom, Government, Iraq, Politics — a113n @ 03:22  (Current Mood: Worried worried)

              I was just reading this article about a recent UN-sponsored conference on racism in Geneva, Switzerland. The conference has gotten some media attention due to several nations (US, Canada, Australia to name a few) boycotting the conference altogether. Prior to Iran’s president Ahmadinejad’s (who can type that without copy-and-paste) speech, the boycotting states claimed the basis of the conference (revising a UN document on racism and human rights) was undermined with Israel-Palestinian relations. Now, Ahmad (so much better) caused more states to walk out of the conference due to his overwhelmingly-racist speech, where he purported his same ole routine about Israel oppression. Even Ban Ki-Moon chimed in on the inappropriateness of the comments, going as far as claiming that he instructed Ahmad not to take the route that he did. However, aside from the general drama with the walkout and general racist language from Ahmad (it’s a sad fact when we are simply accustomed to hearing such inappropriate language from him, where you can easily tell he makes the claims he does only to score political points), there are several undertones of this article.

              The way I read the article, there appears to be two reactions to Ahmad’s remarks: applause and disgust. Perhaps it’s the author’s style, but I get the sense of two very distinct groups who’s core beliefs and understanding are so widely different that it’s almost oil and water. No matter how much sense I try to fall back on, I can’t shake the feeling that the differences here are prophetic of the subtle differences compounded out into a world war. Given a long enough time line, history is the present. Is there not a fine line between a collection of states coming together and working out their differences with words and policy and a collection of states settling differences in their self-evident, unwavering values through war and terrorism (real terrorism, not the %*@! we are bombarded with by the government)? In the case of the latter, the UN almost seems like a catalyst to catastrophe.

              Also, the article (and the other I read prior to the start of the conference regarding the boycott) makes me wonder why Israel is singled out. With racism playing a role in the day-to-day activities of people in all countries, what has put Israel at the top of the list? Sure, it could be the simple answer of the recent wars and skirmishes and claims of human rights abuses abound in these times of war, but given the (relatively) short timeline of these events, I do not see how the claims, even if true, could amount to the devastation laid out by other wars and dictators, much of which racism seeds. Therefore, the set of states that contribute to the document must either have good cause to put Israel at the top of the list, or a conspiracy is afloat. No proof of either, but one quote in particular stands out in this recent article. The organizer of the conference did not directly defend Ahmad, but does believe France, Germany, and the others who walked out were out of line. Given the way the article is written, there does seem to be some non-verbal sign of appeasement with Ahmad versus conflict with the states who are reacting to hypocrisy in spreading racism at an anti-racism conference. The organizer’s tone seems very different of that of the Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. It’s probably just me, but something about the UN involvement here and Ahmad’s prodding seems questionable.

              Of course, the US involvement in Iraq is ammunition for Ahmad, just another reason Americans need to understand how Bush’s ill-conceived policies do much more harm than good. The actions of this country need to be justifiable, because that puts justice on our side. And we need justice on our side, especially if the worse case of this blog happened to play out. Iran leading both the states that feel disenfranchised, likening Ahmad to Robin Hood, all the while ignoring how true sovereignty gave way to oppression in the name of Islam, and the states that Israel or the US has, in some way real or imagined, stepped on like the little kid with the biggest walking stick. In the other corner would be what we would call the defenders of freedom and justice, the “Western” democratic states who have supported Israel and thrived economically. However, I hope that we can realize that one country’s patriot is another country’s terrorist; the good news is that I do believe we can realize this–the bad news is that I am not sure about states that would align themselves with Ahmad, and certainly doubtful about Iran itself.

              It’s 01:14, and this is my apocalypse. 2012 is supposed to be the year, I definitely see the circumstances unfolding that would make such a deadline possible. But such a dreary, bleak entry should find it’s way to my DeadJournal.

                    • Current Location: office
                        • Website Rating: ****
                        • Website Description: Download online content (videos, images, HTML components, etc) in a variety of formats, with auto-convert (i.e., YouTube -> local AVI)

                      19.Nov.2008

                      Getting ET’s Attention

                      Filed under: Conservative, Liberal, Personal — a113n @ 22:49  (Current Mood: Contemplative contemplative)

                      I stumbled upon this article when I Googled for dangers of sending spacecraft beyond solar system. Through my Stumbling, I found a page discussing Saturn’s icy moon and the space craft having flow past it. These craft are going to explore the outer realms of our solar system, but I stopped to wonder who–or what would be there to retrieve them. The article, in a long-winded manner, more-or-less covers some of my concerns:

                      “Along with the famous plaques attached to Pioneer 10 and 11 and the two phonograph records carried by Voyager 1 and 2—four spacecraft that will soon leave our Solar System—these messages are mostly symbolic efforts unlikely to betray our presence to the denizens of planets orbiting other stars. Our civilization is still hidden from all but those ardently searching for our kind, or those so far beyond our level of sophistication that we couldn’t hide from them if we wanted to. To date, all our “messages to aliens” are really more successful as communications to Earth, mirrors reflecting our dreams of reaching far beyond our terrestrial nursery.”

                      At a minimum, we need to keep the considerations on the table and think twice before blasting “We’re here!” just because we can.

                            • Current Location: Cabin
                                • Website Rating: ***
                                • Website Description: Information for The Elder Scrolls series including Oblivion and Morrowind, well-designed video games with intricate story lines and original RPG components

                              3.Mar.2006

                              Agents knocking at my door

                              Filed under: Federal, Government, Neoteric, Personal, Professional — a113n @ 10:29

                              Last night I had a visit
                              from some government agents. You’d think they’d let me have my last day of peace, but nooooooooooo–I had to go and get
                              myself entangled in some deep $#%@. Well, I’m not really entangled in it, but they needed to know what I know, which I’m
                              not sure that I know anything that I think I know, so I’m not sure how they know what I know or at least what I think I
                              know, but maybe they know that I don’t know what I know and so they want to know. Yeh, that sounds more like
                              it.

                              Anyhow, Neoteric is in some trouble regarding an Iranian–an Iranian I was against hiring in the first place.
                              Not due to some bigotry or the fact that I didn’t want to hire the man, but we had too many other problems to deal with
                              aside from immigration acts! Since I was somewhat active in the acquistion of this employee, and I am well versed in the
                              company’s business practices, these agents showed up at my door at 9:30. I was a bit turned off by the fact that they knew
                              not only where my house was located, but also the color and size. Talk about nerve shattering.

                              So this is how I
                              spend my last day, wondering what these agents are compiling and whether or not I can just walk away from the situation.
                              Whatever happened to keg stands and sleeping where you fall…

                                • Quote of the Day:
                                  Boy:
                                  "What's a joint?"
                                  Lady: "Show me your hand. This bump on your hand is a joint."
                                  Boy: "I know another kind of
                                  joint."
                                  Lady: "What's that?"
                                  Boy: "It's what [name deleted] comes over and does with my mom."
                                  • Current Location: Neoteric

                                          19.Dec.2005

                                          I am neither conservative nor liberal, but p&*$@ed off

                                          Filed under: Bush, Federal, Freedom, Government, Iraq, Politics — a113n @ 10:29
                                          align="right">

                                          I consider myself an American by every twist of the word. I
                                          believe in the God-given freedoms, I am well-versed in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as well as
                                          American history. I fully support the troops abroad, and I cede that war is innevitable.

                                          However, I do not believe
                                          that our freedom is clippable. We CANNOT sacrifice freedom for security. I am not an opponent of George Bush, though many
                                          who know me may claim otherwise. I supported him during the aftermath of 9/11–I felt he brought unity at a pivotal time
                                          when unity was a vague idea. I supported the invasion of Afghanistan in order to find Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. I did not
                                          support the invasion of Iraq, though I support the remove of Hussein. None of this gives anyone the right to spy on
                                          Americans. If there are foreign nationals within America who are up to no good, boot ‘em. If there are Americans who have
                                          betrayed the state in exchange for patrotism to a foreign war, boot ‘em. However, we do not have to cede liberties to
                                          accomplish this.

                                          It seems that the Democrats
                                          have remembered a key politcal ideal that Republicans have forgotten:
                                          Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts
                                          absolutely

                                          What is worse is that Bush supporters continue to hold their ground, justifying Bush’s actions and href="http://www.blogsforbush.com/">praising him! I know that they believe it is better to stand your ground than to
                                          back down, to support at all costs, but even to the point of dismantling American rights? How far will they follow Bush,
                                          even when his own party has begun to distance themselves from the new allegations? I merely want Americans to stand up and
                                          be Americans, to hold their ground for what is right, now what they have always believed to be right.

                                          I released my
                                          support of Bush during the last election due to a number of issues that he always ignored and his supporters shrug off. He
                                          allowed false CIA information to enter the Iraqi situation in order to support the invasion, he made jokes when now WMDs
                                          were found, and he has repeatedly claimed that finding Bin Laden was not a high priority! I simply don’t get how so many
                                          Americans can be so blind. Of course we should stay the course in Iraq, but this does not justify, or require continued
                                          justification for Bush regarding our presence there in the first place!

                                            • Quote of the Day:

                                              "Security at

                                              the expense of freedom is slavery"

                                              "Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security, will not have, nor do

                                              they deserve, either one."

                                              --Benjamin Franklin


                                                        Powered by WordPress

                                                        Last Updated At 19-Dec-2009 0:08