a113n’s daily dose

Salem, NC just got a bit more enticing from my point-of-view. The citizens of this small town, supported by their local government, have taken on Time Warner Cable by establishing a civil-run ISP, providing 10 Mbps both up and down at each house, cable television, and internet phone, all for $99/month. The system, named Greenlight, came into existence after the town petitioned Time Warner for better service in the area; Time Warner refused, and the citizens took it upon themselves.

Now Time Warner is pulling together it’s lobbying forces on a bill in the North Carolina legislature that will make it more difficult for other cities to follow suit. In the name of “anti-competition”, Time Warner is claiming that Greenlight unfairly leverages the power of the government to push Time Warner out of business in Salem and any other city that follows suit. Mama Bear would call shenanigans. I’m going to come out right, with no child-filtering, and say this is BULL SHIT. I am sick and tired of the large corporations pushing around their weight in order to maintain their bottom line while stomping in the American people. Tiered pricing. (Un)Net-Neutrality.

And, I’m very jealous that my small town of Unionville or even Bloomington does not do something similar. I may have a friend in the higher-up–should I contact her and ask for advice? This town would jump on this in a heartbeat. So long Comcast–Time Warner’s brother-in-arms.

• Current Music: Apocalyptica - One
  
• Current Location: Office
  

I was just reading this article about a recent UN-sponsored conference on racism in Geneva, Switzerland. The conference has gotten some media attention due to several nations (US, Canada, Australia to name a few) boycotting the conference altogether. Prior to Iran’s president Ahmadinejad’s (who can type that without copy-and-paste) speech, the boycotting states claimed the basis of the conference (revising a UN document on racism and human rights) was undermined with Israel-Palestinian relations. Now, Ahmad (so much better) caused more states to walk out of the conference due to his overwhelmingly-racist speech, where he purported his same ole routine about Israel oppression. Even Ban Ki-Moon chimed in on the inappropriateness of the comments, going as far as claiming that he instructed Ahmad not to take the route that he did. However, aside from the general drama with the walkout and general racist language from Ahmad (it’s a sad fact when we are simply accustomed to hearing such inappropriate language from him, where you can easily tell he makes the claims he does only to score political points), there are several undertones of this article.

The way I read the article, there appears to be two reactions to Ahmad’s remarks: applause and disgust. Perhaps it’s the author’s style, but I get the sense of two very distinct groups who’s core beliefs and understanding are so widely different that it’s almost oil and water. No matter how much sense I try to fall back on, I can’t shake the feeling that the differences here are prophetic of the subtle differences compounded out into a world war. Given a long enough time line, history is the present. Is there not a fine line between a collection of states coming together and working out their differences with words and policy and a collection of states settling differences in their self-evident, unwavering values through war and terrorism (real terrorism, not the %*@! we are bombarded with by the government)? In the case of the latter, the UN almost seems like a catalyst to catastrophe.

Also, the article (and the other I read prior to the start of the conference regarding the boycott) makes me wonder why Israel is singled out. With racism playing a role in the day-to-day activities of people in all countries, what has put Israel at the top of the list? Sure, it could be the simple answer of the recent wars and skirmishes and claims of human rights abuses abound in these times of war, but given the (relatively) short timeline of these events, I do not see how the claims, even if true, could amount to the devastation laid out by other wars and dictators, much of which racism seeds. Therefore, the set of states that contribute to the document must either have good cause to put Israel at the top of the list, or a conspiracy is afloat. No proof of either, but one quote in particular stands out in this recent article. The organizer of the conference did not directly defend Ahmad, but does believe France, Germany, and the others who walked out were out of line. Given the way the article is written, there does seem to be some non-verbal sign of appeasement with Ahmad versus conflict with the states who are reacting to hypocrisy in spreading racism at an anti-racism conference. The organizer’s tone seems very different of that of the Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. It’s probably just me, but something about the UN involvement here and Ahmad’s prodding seems questionable.

Of course, the US involvement in Iraq is ammunition for Ahmad, just another reason Americans need to understand how Bush’s ill-conceived policies do much more harm than good. The actions of this country need to be justifiable, because that puts justice on our side. And we need justice on our side, especially if the worse case of this blog happened to play out. Iran leading both the states that feel disenfranchised, likening Ahmad to Robin Hood, all the while ignoring how true sovereignty gave way to oppression in the name of Islam, and the states that Israel or the US has, in some way real or imagined, stepped on like the little kid with the biggest walking stick. In the other corner would be what we would call the defenders of freedom and justice, the “Western” democratic states who have supported Israel and thrived economically. However, I hope that we can realize that one country’s patriot is another country’s terrorist; the good news is that I do believe we can realize this–the bad news is that I am not sure about states that would align themselves with Ahmad, and certainly doubtful about Iran itself.

It’s 01:14, and this is my apocalypse. 2012 is supposed to be the year, I definitely see the circumstances unfolding that would make such a deadline possible. But such a dreary, bleak entry should find it’s way to my DeadJournal.

• Current Location: office
  
• Website: http://www.farkie.com/
  
• Website Rating:
  
• Website Description: Download online content (videos, images, HTML components, etc) in a variety of formats, with auto-convert (i.e., YouTube -> local AVI)
  

Last night I had a visit
from some government agents. You’d think they’d let me have my last day of peace, but nooooooooooo–I had to go and get
myself entangled in some deep $#%@. Well, I’m not really entangled in it, but they needed to know what I know, which I’m
not sure that I know anything that I think I know, so I’m not sure how they know what I know or at least what I think I
know, but maybe they know that I don’t know what I know and so they want to know. Yeh, that sounds more like
it.

Anyhow, Neoteric is in some trouble regarding an Iranian–an Iranian I was against hiring in the first place.
Not due to some bigotry or the fact that I didn’t want to hire the man, but we had too many other problems to deal with
aside from immigration acts! Since I was somewhat active in the acquistion of this employee, and I am well versed in the
company’s business practices, these agents showed up at my door at 9:30. I was a bit turned off by the fact that they knew
not only where my house was located, but also the color and size. Talk about nerve shattering.

So this is how I
spend my last day, wondering what these agents are compiling and whether or not I can just walk away from the situation.
Whatever happened to keg stands and sleeping where you fall…

• Quote of the Day:
  Boy:
  "What's a joint?"
  Lady: "Show me your hand. This bump on your hand is a joint."
  Boy: "I know another kind of
  joint."
  Lady: "What's that?"
  Boy: "It's what [name deleted] comes over and does with my mom."
  
• Current Location: Neoteric